GPU Comparisons / RTX A6000 vs RTX 3090
RTX A6000 vs RTX 3090 for Local LLMs: Which Should You Pick
For 70B on one card: RTX A6000 (48GB, fits at the ceiling). If you accept dual-card tinkering: two 3090s — same capacity, double the aggregate bandwidth, ~$600 cheaper.
Spec Comparison
| RTX A6000 | RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal VRAM | 48 GB | 24 GB |
| Usable VRAM (for models) | 48.0 GB | 24.0 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 936 GB/s |
| Type | Discrete GPU | Discrete GPU |
| Release year | 2020 | 2020 |
| MSRP | $4,650 | $1,499 |
| Used reference price | $2,800 | $1,100 |
| TDP | 300 W | 350 W |
Model Verdict Matrix (Q4_K_M @8K)
| Model | VRAM needed | RTX A6000 | Theoretical speed | RTX 3090 | Theoretical speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.2 3B | 4.4 GB | Comfortable | ≈293 | Comfortable | ≈357 |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 7.5 GB | Comfortable | ≈117 | Comfortable | ≈143 |
| Qwen3 8B | 7.7 GB | Comfortable | ≈115 | Comfortable | ≈140 |
| Phi-4 14B | 12.2 GB | Comfortable | ≈64 | Comfortable | ≈78 |
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | 17.5 GB | Comfortable | ≈39 | Comfortable | ≈48 |
| Gemma 3 27B | 22.4 GB | Comfortable | ≈34 | Tight fit | ≈42 |
| Qwen3.8 27B | 20.7 GB | Comfortable | ≈34 | Tight fit | ≈41 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 20.1 GB | Comfortable | ≈32 | Tight fit | ≈39 |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | 21.0 GB | Comfortable | ≈285 | Tight fit | ≈347 |
| Qwen3 32B | 23.7 GB | Comfortable | ≈29 | Tight fit | ≈35 |
| gpt-oss-20b | 14.7 GB | Comfortable | ≈261 | Comfortable | ≈318 |
| Llama 3.3 70B | 47.4 GB | Tight fit | ≈13 | Not feasible | — |
| gpt-oss-120b | 73.6 GB | Not feasible | — | Not feasible | — |
| DeepSeek-R1 671B | 413.1 GB | Not feasible | — | Not feasible | — |
Highlighted rows = watershed models where the two cards' verdicts differ. Theoretical speed = bandwidth × 0.75 ÷ per-token weight bytes (active params for MoE); real-world results vary with framework/driver/CPU, ±30%. Speed is hidden for multi-GPU/infeasible verdicts.
Value Comparison
| RTX A6000 | RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth per dollar | 0.27 GB/s/$ | 0.85 GB/s/$ |
| Usable VRAM per dollar | 0.017 GB/$ | 0.022 GB/$ |
Pricing basis: RTX A6000 = used reference price; RTX 3090 = used reference price; used prices are market estimates, see analysis for volatility.
Analysis
The core number of this comparison is 48GB: the A6000 holds Llama 3.3 70B Q4 (~47.4GB) on a single card — tight, at a theoretical ~13 tok/s — while a lone 24GB 3090 marks 70B infeasible in the matrix. But two layer-split 3090s also give 48GB, tying the verdict, and their aggregate bandwidth of 936×2×0.85 ≈ 1591 GB/s is over double the A6000's 768 — 70B at theoretically ~28 tok/s, double the speed too.
The price math: a used A6000 runs $2,500-3,200; dual 3090s cost ~$2,200 — cheaper and faster. What the A6000's premium buys is certainty: single-card blower cooling, 300W TDP (vs 700W combined), ECC memory, NVLink, and no layer-splitting to configure — quiet and stable in a workstation. Dual 3090s demand PCIe lanes on the motherboard, an 850W+ PSU, case airflow, and multi-GPU framework setup, all at once.
Verdict: commercial settings, tinkering-averse, slot- or noise-constrained — the A6000 is the standard answer to '70B on one card'; budget-sensitive, enjoys tinkering, or cares about the speed ceiling — dual 3090s win on value, and day-to-day the two cards can even serve different 24B models independently. Note 70B is at the ceiling on both routes; for Q6/Q8 or gpt-oss-120b, look at the A100 80GB or Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB.
FAQ
- Can the RTX A6000 run 70B on one card?
- Yes, at the ceiling: Llama 3.3 70B Q4_K_M @8K is ~47.4GB against 48GB — a tight fit at a theoretical ~13 tok/s. For Q6/Q8 or long-context headroom you need an 80GB-class card or two GPUs.
- Dual 3090s vs A6000 for 70B — which is faster?
- Dual 3090s: aggregate bandwidth 936×2×0.85 ≈ 1591 vs 768 GB/s, theoretically ~28 vs ~13 tok/s on 70B, and ~$600 cheaper. The cost is PCIe layer-splitting setup, 700W, and multi-GPU maintenance.
- Does the A6000's ECC memory matter for inference?
- Marginally: ECC adds negligible overhead in some frameworks but buys stability under sustained load — a real benefit for commercial/24-7 deployments, imperceptible for hobby use.
Related guides
- Multi-GPU Setup for Local LLMs: NVLink, PCIe & Layer Splitting
- Why Memory Bandwidth Determines LLM Inference Speed
- Best GPU for Local LLMs in 2026: Every Budget Tier
- Read the full RTX A6000 breakdown →
- Read the full RTX 3090 breakdown →
- Try RTX A6000 in the GPU compatibility checker →
- Try RTX 3090 in the GPU compatibility checker →
Data verified 2026-09-01