GPUFits

GPUs / Mac Studio M4 Max (64GB)

Mac Studio M4 Max (64GB) for Local LLMs: What It Runs and How Fast

The Mac Studio M4 Max 64GB is the lowest rung of the 70B club: ~48GB of usable unified memory, with Llama 3.3 70B Q4 (~47.4GB) just barely fitting. Buy the full 16-core-CPU/40-core-GPU version for 546 GB/s — the 14-core version has only 410 GB/s, a small price gap but a big LLM experience gap. Around $2,899 (est.: $2,499 + $400 for the 36→64GB upgrade, pending manual review).

What the money buys: silent 70B (theoretical ~10 tok/s, readable), blazing MoE at the 30B level (30B-A3B ~200 tok/s), and macOS's out-of-box MLX/llama.cpp ecosystem. Against dual 3090s: same price, same capacity, but ~80% less power, silent, zero maintenance; it loses on gaming, the CUDA ecosystem, and resale flexibility. It is the standard answer to “I want 70B without becoming an operator”, and one of the most-asked machines on this site.

Specs

Nominal VRAM64 GB
Usable VRAM (for models)48.0 GB
Memory bandwidth546 GB/s
TypeUnified memory
Release year2025
MSRP$2,899
TDP80 W

Apple unified memory is counted at 75% usable for models (the rest serves the system/display).

Value Metrics

Bandwidth per dollar
0.19 GB/s/$
Usable VRAM per dollar
0.017 GB/$

Based on MSRP (no used price yet); used prices are market estimates, see commentary for volatility.

Model Verdict Matrix (Q4_K_M @8K)

Model VRAM needed Verdict Recommended quant Theoretical speed
Llama 3.2 3B 4.4 GB Comfortable FP16 ≈64 tok/s Try it →
Llama 3.1 8B 7.5 GB Comfortable FP16 ≈25 tok/s Try it →
Qwen3 8B 7.7 GB Comfortable FP16 ≈25 tok/s Try it →
Phi-4 14B 12.2 GB Comfortable FP16 ≈14 tok/s Try it →
Mistral Small 3.2 24B 17.5 GB Comfortable Q8_0 ≈16 tok/s Try it →
Gemma 3 27B 22.4 GB Comfortable Q8_0 ≈14 tok/s Try it →
Qwen3.8 27B 20.7 GB Comfortable Q8_0 ≈14 tok/s Try it →
Muse Glimmer 30B 20.1 GB Comfortable Q8_0 ≈13 tok/s Try it →
Qwen3 30B-A3B 21.0 GB Comfortable Q8_0 ≈117 tok/s Try it →
Qwen3 32B 23.7 GB Comfortable Q8_0 ≈12 tok/s Try it →
gpt-oss-20b 14.7 GB Comfortable FP16 ≈57 tok/s Try it →
Llama 3.3 70B 47.4 GB Tight fit Q4_K_M ≈9 tok/s Try it →
gpt-oss-120b 73.6 GB Not feasible needs 2 cards Try it →
DeepSeek-R1 671B 413.1 GB Not feasible Try it →

Theoretical speed = bandwidth × 0.75 ÷ per-token weight bytes (active params for MoE); real-world results vary with framework/driver/CPU, ±30%.

FAQ

Can the Mac Studio M4 Max 64GB run 70B?
Tight: Llama 3.3 70B Q4_K_M @8K is ~47.4GB against ~48GB usable — it fits at the ceiling, theoretically ~10 tok/s. For headroom or Q6, choose the 96GB M3 Ultra.
Does the 14-core vs 16-core version matter?
Hugely for LLMs: 410 vs 546 GB/s bandwidth — a 33% decode speed difference. The price gap is far smaller than the experience gap; for LLMs, buy the full 16-core/40-GPU version.
M4 Max 64GB or dual 3090s?
Same price and capacity: dual 3090s bring more aggregate bandwidth (~1591 vs 546 GB/s) and CUDA; the M4 Max is silent, ~80% cheaper to power, and zero-maintenance. Always-on/speed: dual 3090s; daily desktop: Mac.

Related guides

Try Mac Studio M4 Max (64GB) in the GPU compatibility checker →

Data verified 2026-09-01