GPU Comparisons / RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 3090
RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 3090 for Local LLMs: Which Should You Pick
LLM-first: take the 3090 — 24GB vs 16GB is the qualitative line between 'runs 24-32B' and 'cannot'. Choose the 4070 Ti Super only if gaming comes first or you have zero mining-risk tolerance.
Spec Comparison
| RTX 4070 Ti Super | RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal VRAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Usable VRAM (for models) | 16.0 GB | 24.0 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 936 GB/s |
| Type | Discrete GPU | Discrete GPU |
| Release year | 2024 | 2020 |
| MSRP | $799 | $1,499 |
| Used reference price | $760 | $1,100 |
| TDP | 285 W | 350 W |
Model Verdict Matrix (Q4_K_M @8K)
| Model | VRAM needed | RTX 4070 Ti Super | Theoretical speed | RTX 3090 | Theoretical speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.2 3B | 4.4 GB | Comfortable | ≈256 | Comfortable | ≈357 |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 7.5 GB | Comfortable | ≈102 | Comfortable | ≈143 |
| Qwen3 8B | 7.7 GB | Comfortable | ≈100 | Comfortable | ≈140 |
| Phi-4 14B | 12.2 GB | Comfortable | ≈56 | Comfortable | ≈78 |
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | 17.5 GB | Needs multi-GPU | — | Comfortable | ≈48 |
| Gemma 3 27B | 22.4 GB | Not feasible | — | Tight fit | ≈42 |
| Qwen3.8 27B | 20.7 GB | Not feasible | — | Tight fit | ≈41 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 20.1 GB | Not feasible | — | Tight fit | ≈39 |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | 21.0 GB | Not feasible | — | Tight fit | ≈347 |
| Qwen3 32B | 23.7 GB | Not feasible | — | Tight fit | ≈35 |
| gpt-oss-20b | 14.7 GB | Tight fit | ≈229 | Comfortable | ≈318 |
| Llama 3.3 70B | 47.4 GB | Not feasible | — | Not feasible | — |
| gpt-oss-120b | 73.6 GB | Not feasible | — | Not feasible | — |
| DeepSeek-R1 671B | 413.1 GB | Not feasible | — | Not feasible | — |
Highlighted rows = watershed models where the two cards' verdicts differ. Theoretical speed = bandwidth × 0.75 ÷ per-token weight bytes (active params for MoE); real-world results vary with framework/driver/CPU, ±30%. Speed is hidden for multi-GPU/infeasible verdicts.
Value Comparison
| RTX 4070 Ti Super | RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth per dollar | 0.88 GB/s/$ | 0.85 GB/s/$ |
| Usable VRAM per dollar | 0.021 GB/$ | 0.022 GB/$ |
Pricing basis: RTX 4070 Ti Super = used reference price; RTX 3090 = used reference price; used prices are market estimates, see analysis for volatility.
Analysis
This looks like a $760 vs $1,100 price fight, but it's really a 16GB vs 24GB capacity cliff. In the verdict matrix, Mistral Small 24B (Q4 ~17.5GB) already exceeds the 4070 Ti Super's hard 16GB ceiling — you'd drop to Q3 or go multi-GPU; Gemma 3 27B, Qwen3.8 27B, Muse Glimmer 30B, Qwen3 30B-A3B and Qwen3 32B are all infeasible, while the 3090 runs them comfortably or tightly. The 16GB card's ceiling stops at gpt-oss-20b (tight, ~14.7GB).
The 4070 Ti Super's legitimacy lies elsewhere: a January 2024 card that is essentially mining-free, 285W TDP (65W below the 3090), headroom to run the 8B tier at Q8_0 (~11.4GB), and bandwidth per dollar of 0.88 vs 0.85 — a slight win. If your model targets are locked to the 8-14B tier, it is newer, more efficient, and worry-free.
But in the LLM world, money goes to VRAM first: a $1,100 used 3090 brings 24GB and 936 GB/s — a full model tier more coverage, plus a dual-card path to 70B later. The cost is inspecting a 2020 card (GDDR6X memory temps, mining history). One line: LLM as your main use, buy the 3090; LLM as a side dish, buy the 4070 Ti Super; if you're stuck under $800 but dreaming of 24B, keep saving — 16GB holds no miracles.
FAQ
- Can the 16GB RTX 4070 Ti Super run 24B models?
- No: Mistral Small 24B Q4 needs ~17.5GB, over the hard 16GB ceiling — you'd drop to Q3 or multi-GPU. This is a capacity cliff, not a performance gap; the 24GB 3090 runs it comfortably.
- Is the 4070 Ti Super more power-efficient than the 3090?
- Yes: 285W vs 350W TDP on a 2024 architecture with better per-token efficiency. But pick an LLM GPU by VRAM tier first, watts second — efficiency can't run a model that doesn't fit.
- Any alternatives at this price?
- At $720-800 it's one of the few mining-free 16GB N-cards; stretch to ~$1,100 for a used 3090 (24GB); if capped near $700 and targeting 8-14B, it's a sane pick.
Related guides
- Best GPU for Local LLMs in 2026: Every Budget Tier
- Quantization Explained: Q4 vs Q8 and What You Actually Lose
- How Much VRAM per Billion Parameters? (2026 Cheat Sheet)
- Read the full RTX 4070 Ti Super breakdown →
- Read the full RTX 3090 breakdown →
- Try RTX 4070 Ti Super in the GPU compatibility checker →
- Try RTX 3090 in the GPU compatibility checker →
Data verified 2026-09-01